Political Hotsheet
October 4, 2010 11:00 AM

Is Rand Paul Still a Tea Partier?

Republican U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul addresses a news conference after picking up the endorsement of the National Federation of Independent Business in Louisville, Ky., Thursday, Sept. 23, 2010.

(Credit: AP)

Gone unnoticed in all the debate in recent months over the Tea Party movement has been a striking shift: One of the ostensible champions of the movement has quietly moved, squarely if uneasily, into the GOP establishment. 

That Tea Party standard-bearer is Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Dr. Rand Paul, who beat establishment choice Trey Grayson to win the state's GOP primary in May. Before and (to a slightly lesser extent) during the primary, Paul was known as a full-throated, Libertarian-leaning Republican in the style of his father, Texas Republican and former presidential candidate Ron Paul.

The younger Paul unapologetically showed off those views in national media interviews following his primary victory. Asked about the Civil Rights Act of 1964, he suggested that while he opposes discrimination, he wasn't convinced the federal government should be telling restaurants who they can and can't serve - if they want to turn away black people, he seemed to be saying, it wasn't the government's job to tell them not to. 

Paul soon backed away from that position, but there were other headaches: He suggested the requirement that businesses provide equal access to unemployed Americans (as mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act) wasn't fair to business owners, and said that President Obama putting "his boot heel on the throat of BP" after the Gulf oil spill was "really un-American." The comments earned Paul characterizations by some in the national media as a Libertarian extremist, as well as nervous comments from fellow Republicans; Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl memorably said Paul was engaged in the sort of debate "you had at 2 a.m. in the morning when you're going to college, but it doesn't have a lot to do with anything." 

Critical Contests: Interactive Map with CBS News' Election 2010 Race Ratings

Members of the Republican establishment, meanwhile, started to be asked if they would continue to support Paul. The answer was a qualified yes - so long as he got with the program. "If he'll stick to the jobs, debt and terror and providing a check-and-balance on a runaway government in Washington, he'll be the next Republican senator," Sen. Lamar Alexander said on CBS' Face the Nation. "We'll be glad to have him."

Paul got the message. He stopped showcasing his more Libertarian beliefs in national interviews and moderated his earlier, more controversial positions. Following a mining accident in May, Paul first seemed to dismiss calls for more oversight, saying that "sometimes accidents happen"; by September, however, he was signaling he was open to adding more mine inspectors.

(Credit: AP Photo/Stephen Lance Dennee)
On foreign policy, Paul, like his father, had expressed strong concerns about America's military presence abroad. And while he hasn't repudiated those positions, he has largely stopped talking about them; he said on the campaign trail in July that, "I'm not really thinking about Afghanistan; foreign policy is really a complete non-issue."  

There's more: Despite once deeming Medicare "socialized medicine," he opposed reductions in Medicare payments for doctors; he decided to back a fence on the southern border after having previously compared one to the Berlin Wall.

The degree to which Rand Paul had moved in the direction of traditional Republicanism - and away from his perpetual GOP outsider father - was underlined in the split between the two men on the question of the Islamic cultural center that came to be known as the "Ground Zero mosque."

Ron Paul decried "demagogy" on the issue and said it was being used to generate "hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars." Rand Paul, by contrast, followed other Republicans and said the cultural center should not be built. "The Muslim community would better serve the healing process by making a donation to the memorial fund for the victims of September 11th," he said.

Paul's behavior after that chaotic post-primary week was enough to placate the party establishment. In June, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who had backed Grayson in the primary, hosted a high-dollar fundraiser for Paul in Washington - despite Paul's earlier pledge not to take money from supporters of the TARP bank bailout, McConnell among them. By September, the National Republican Senatorial Committee was running campaign ads on Paul's behalf. 

At a debate Sunday against Democratic opponent Jack Conway, Paul said he would back whoever Republicans picked to lead them in the Senate - presumably McConnell - instead of vowing to rally around an alternate Tea Party power base, likely led by Sen. Jim DeMint.

At left, Nancy Cordes reports on the debate and the race for the CBS Evening News.

It is not uncommon for a candidate to moderate positions following a primary in order to win votes in a general election. But for a Tea Party candidate like Paul - someone whose message was grounded in opposition to the establishment from both parties - it's hard to square his earlier posture with the warm embrace he has received from the establishment.

Paul's campaign manager, Jesse Benton, disputes the notion that Paul has shifted since his primary win.

"The media and liberal elites have spent months trying unsuccessfully to paint Dr. Paul as some sort of extremist," Benton said in response to this story. "It is funny to a see a full reversal to now critique him for being somehow too 'moderate.' The bottom line is, Rand's positions have not changed. His gives the same speeches and holds the same platform now that he did in the primary: balanced budgets, term limits, an end to out-of-control government and real reform in Washington."

Indeed, Paul has continued to stress fiscal conservatism and commitment to smaller government throughout the campaign, and he held a rally with DeMint on Saturday. But he has also talked less and less about the Tea Party, opting at Sunday's debate to his place emphasis, like many other Republican candidates, on tying his opponent to Washington and the policies of President Obama such as cap-and-trade and the stimulus package.

Republican Senate Hopeful Paul Rand of Kentucky Denies Kidnapping Allegations (Credit: AP)
Paul is not the only candidate whose Tea Party views have seemed to soften under the glare of the national spotlight. Consider early Tea Party darling and Florida GOP Senate candidate Marco Rubio - who, it should be pointed out, was never entirely plausible as a Tea Party outsider candidate in the first place, since he had served as Florida House speaker.

While appearing on conservative Laura Ingraham's radio show last year, Rubio signed a pledge in support of partial privatization of Social Security, and he backed private accounts in January and February. Since then, however, he has moved away from that stance, insisting the time to consider private accounts has "come and gone."

A similar retreat was undertaken by Tea Party darling and GOP Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle. Angle initially called Social Security a "broken" system that "can't be fixed," and called for it (and Medicare) to be phased out and perhaps replaced by a private system.

She later moved away from those comments, however, claiming she would "like to save Social Security." Angle also claimed last week that she doesn't want to privatize the Department of Veteran's Affairs - despite having pushed for moving toward a "privatized system" in May.

Rubio and Angle's shift away from their strong statements on Social Security, which is known as "the third rail of American politics" for good reason, is not a tremendous surprise. But it does suggest that their Tea Party moorings are somewhat more malleable than their most fervent supporters might prefer.

As for Paul - who once cast himself as part of a "Tea Party tidal wave" - the question going forward is who he will be if he gets to the Senate: An idealistic, Libertarian-leaning antiestablishment figure looking to shake up the system, or a relatively mainstream Republican soldier content to toe the GOP line.

Paul, Conway Face Off in Kentucky Senate Debate
CBSNews.com Special Report: Election 2010


Brian Montopoli is a political reporter for CBSNews.com. You can read more of his posts here. Follow Hotsheet on Facebook and Twitter.
Tags:
Tea Party ,
Kentucky ,
Rand Paul
Topics:
Republicans ,
Campaign 2010 ,
Tea Party

Add a Comment See all 82 Comments
by user000049586849302948603 October 5, 2010 4:40 AM EDT
In familiar 'bagger fashion, the trick has been that his handlers have gotten between him and any open microphone.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 October 4, 2010 10:55 PM EDT
Who? Ayn Rand Paul? He is not sounding quite as insane as during the primary. Unfortunately, he is just as wacked as before....just has better advisors now.
Reply to this comment
by documemts October 4, 2010 7:53 PM EDT
$$$s change everything.
Reply to this comment
by mikelpond October 4, 2010 7:52 PM EDT
What we do know: Rand Paul is an idiot. Lucky for him he's running as a republican because the only republicans that read are the super-rich. You remember what R.R. called the rest: "usefull idiots"!
Reply to this comment
by user000049586849302948603 October 4, 2010 7:52 PM EDT
Uh-huh, changing his 'bagger tune.
Reply to this comment
by Cassarit October 4, 2010 6:18 PM EDT
As the son of Ron Paul, Rand was bound to be carrying more common sense genes than those tea partiers. Well done Rand! May the force be with you!
Reply to this comment
by documemts October 4, 2010 7:54 PM EDT
May the farce be with you.
by lumos1 October 4, 2010 5:37 PM EDT
by stevex47 October 4, 2010 4:14 PM EDT---------- "If the whole less taxes, less gubment thing worked, then what went wrong with 8 years of boosh? Trickle down was a catastrophe, 3 times now, right? (both boosh's) If something fails so badly, so many times, why keep trying it?" ======================================================================= Certainly makes you wonder how such failed policy like "trickle-down" economic lunacy that historically has proven to cost us trillions, increase deficits and add to the national debt beyond belief, would not be trotted-out every time the republicons hoodwink WE THE PEOPLE and gain political power. But......that's all the GOP has, and just like the old, stale "contract on America," they have brought it out of the trash bin, dusted it off, put a new cover on MORE OF THE SAME, and now call it the "plague on America," with the same tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans!
Reply to this comment
by lumos1 October 4, 2010 5:38 PM EDT
The republicons always bet on poor memory for the American people.
by two-cats October 4, 2010 4:55 PM EDT
Of course, Rand Paul had to change his tune! If Americans really understood what Libertarians are all about, they will reject Paul outright, and they should reject him now for becoming a typical GOP type candidate who will be a creature of the lobbies, represent business interests over average people, and award government contracts to its buddies. The GOP spends...they spend big on wars and government contracts, but when it comes to helping the American people, no, they scream and stamp that it is socialism because they represent the rich.
Reply to this comment
by porcine_aviator October 4, 2010 5:57 PM EDT
This guy is no libertarian, get that fact straight. Rand Paul is just another slimy political chameleon.
by Cassarit October 4, 2010 6:24 PM EDT
Rand has rejected the directionless anger of teapartiers who are tired and fed up but don't seem to know what they are fed up with! He has come home to the TRUE conservative wing of the GOP. And there aint nothing wrong with that.
by sorerect October 4, 2010 4:32 PM EDT
The Republicans are "Big Government" too. It's just that the Democrats and Republicans have different versions of it. Both parties are Federalist.
Reply to this comment
by rightbehind October 4, 2010 5:16 PM EDT
Actually republicans have grown the worst kind of government at the state and local levels. The want more power for the states. It's the age old divide and conquer tactic. They feel people will be easier to control broken into groups. They like individuals because they are easy to lay to waste. Don't think for one moment the wealthy and corporations will handle their problems alone. They'll have a firm full of lawyers and a right wing court system.
by thomasmc1957 October 4, 2010 4:26 PM EDT
He's still a punch line to a lot of jokes.
Reply to this comment
See all 82 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com. Follow us on Facebook.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
D.C. Rally Focus: Job Creation, Education & Immigration

Our daily Web show, Washington Unplugged, gives an insider's view of politics & those that make it happen.

More Washington Unplugged
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER
CBS News on Facebook